The Magna Carta Included Protection Against the Jews
- The all-important document of the barons putting limitations on the king’s power included a key part about how the king sided with the Jews.
- Protected against Jewish Usury
- Minors protected from interest on inherited property (38)
- Dowries protected (38)
- The Earl of Clancarty cited the Magna Carta during the 19th-century debates about Jewish emancipation. It was one of the pieces of evidence during his historical survey that convinced him to oppose the Jews.
Jews Were Not Required to Do Usury
- Aldag presents the arguments from both sides and provides evidence proving that, not only were Jews not required to do usury, they were eventually banned from it, and Edward I did everything he could to encourage them to take up other lines of income. (60-63)
- The traditional pro-Jewish argument is that they had to be usurers because they weren’t allowed in guilds and therefore had no other options. (60-61)
- Aldag, however, presents the following facts:
- It was not necessary to belong to a guild in order to conduct business related to the guild’s kind of trade. (61)
- Jews were actually able to join guilds. (61)
- There are even documented cases of Jews belonging to guilds. (61)
- Guilds were not all-important. (62)
- Guilds only existed in certain areas, meaning that even if Jews were excluded from guilds and even if this meant that they couldn’t participate in areas controlled by guilds, they still would have no excuse because most places didn’t have guilds. (62)
- Not only could Jews trade in theory, they did in fact engage in trade. However, they also engaged in usury. (62)
- The Christian oath, which banned Jews from agriculture, was only added after the expulsion of 1290. (62-63)
- They could have been farmers, but they preferred money-lending, and this led to their complete expulsion.
- Similarly, oaths preventing Jews from being craftsmen were only enacted after the expulsion. Jews were not banned from being craftsmen or artisans. (63)
Ritual Murder
- See translator Appendix I and II of Aldag’s work from pages 71 to 124 for scholarship from mainstream but honest sources about Jewish ritual murder.
- 1840 Damascus case of ritual murder
- This case is well-documented, perhaps the best-documented in history. No reasonable doubt with full uncoerced confessions. (472)
- The Jew Montefiore received his knighthood from Queen Victoria for covering up the murder.
- Sir Richard Burton investigated the ritual murders practised among the Jews in Asia Minor.
- Published his findings after his death to avoid Jewish backlash, but his career was still destroyed through a blacklist, and they posthumously censored the most important parts about the murders. (591-592)
- See ‘Sir Richard Burton’ under Heroes.
- See ‘Ritual Murder’ under Themes
Thurloe Papers
- Revealed by Jewish historian Lucien Wolf
- The Jew Carvajal headed a spy ring based in London, and gave very precise information about Charles Stuart, who was closely monitored by Carvajal’s spy, Butler.
- The information included Charles Stuart’s troop strength. (163)
- “He even knew and communicated the number of newly purchased weapons.” With astonishing expertise he reported on even the most intimate affairs taking place at the court of Charles Stuart.” (163)
- The major Ostend victory was due to the spy network. (162-163)
- “...it was even possible to give a precise description of the spies sent to England by Charles Stuart.” (163)
- See ‘Antonio Fernandez Carvajal’ under Villains.
- The spy network may have even saved Cromwell’s life. (164)
- From Butler and Carvajal, Cromwell was kept well-informed about specific Spanish plans for assisting Charles Stuart. (163-164)
- Manuel Martinez Dormido
- Another rich Jew spy
- Corresponded with agents in Holland, especially regarding movement, strength of the Spanish fleet (164)
- Carvajal's employee, de Fonseca, was Dormido’s brother. (165)
- Cromwell personally intervened for him (165)
- See ‘Historian Hilaire Belloc Regarding Worldwide Jewish Spies’ under Quotes.
- See ‘The Danger of Jewish Spies’ under Quotes.
- See ‘Simon [Jacob] de Caceres’ under Villains.
- See ‘Solomon Medina’ under Villains.
- See ‘Antonio Fernandez Carvajal’ under Villains.
- See ‘Jewish Spies’ under Parallels for examples from America and Russia.
- Note Regarding Jewish Spies
- It is crucial to notice that neither Carvajal nor Dormido was a professional spy. It is possible that even Butler may not have been a professional spy in the sense of a James Bond, whose profession is espionage. Rather, they were wealthy and successful Jews who used their positions and international connections to gather and relay information.
- There is an adage: see something, say something. Naturally, a Spanish citizen would report any useful information to the Spanish government. Even a cobbler, if he saw an English fleet, would rush to relay the intelligence. In one sense, therefore, it is proper that Jews behave exactly as they do. Wherever they are in the world, they report the information to fellow Jews to be used in the service of the Jewish cause. What is peculiar about the Jews is their international connections, particularly in high circles. A Jew is taken deep into the confidences of other groups, who believe that the Jew is one of them.
- Butler was evidently in the inner circle of Charles Stuart, while Carvajal was highly placed in Cromwell’s. Dormido had his Spanish connections. Whichever side they chose, they would be perfectly positioned. This is the appeal and the danger of the Jews. For example, Queen Elizabeth believed that she could obtain useful intelligence from Rodrigo Lopez, and perhaps she did. However, he was also providing intelligence to the Spanish crown and tried to poison her! (See ‘Rodrigo Lopez’ under Villains.) History is crammed with examples of people believing that Jews were on their side, only to be stabbed in the back.
Poll in 1753: the People Opposed the Jews
- Taken during the Year of Battle, proving that the public was against the Jews
- 90% of Londoners opposed the Jew Bill. (310)
Jews as Slavers
- Jews were the main slavers in the 18th-century British Empire, which is why the 1740 Plantation Act was passed for them and was not repealed in 1753.
- The 1740 Plantation Act was kept because slavery was done by Jews.
- Lord Chancellor Hardwicke of Parliament: “Even with respect to the Jews, the discouraging of them to go and settle in our American colonies, would be a great loss to, if not the ruin of, the trade of every one of them; for we know that the trade which gives life to the whole, a trade which I do not for very good reasons chuse to name, is chiefly carried on by the Jews, by means of the correspondence they have with their brethren in other parts of America, and without which no such trade could be carried on.” (341)
- Aldag: “A typical example of English hypocrisy! The noble Lord is reluctant to mention the name of this trade, but is nevertheless concerned that this trade should not suffer because of restrictions imposed on the Jews, lest English interests in the colonies be adversely affected or the English have to dirty their otherwise clean hands. In any case, it should not be too difficult to guess this ‘unspeakable’ trade: it could only be the slave trade, which was carried out mainly by Jews.” (341)
Statistics of Jewish Wealth in 1753
- “According to [the Jew] Philo-Patriae's calculations, in 1753 the Jews possessed a twelfth of England's total income and controlled at least a fifth of her exports… The coral trade with India, which was flourishing at the time, was almost entirely controlled by them. This was also the case with the diamond trade and its related industries (e.g., diamond polishing, jewellery, the trinket trade).” (355-356)
Jews Bribed Officials in 1753 for Naturalization Bill
- The bill was vastly unpopular but passed by the representatives largely because of bribes from Jews.
- “Regarding another wealthy Jew, Franco, it became publicly known that on the day the Jewish law was passed he had withdrawn 27 banknotes of £1,000 each from the bank, which were undoubtedly amounts that he paid to those involved as their reward for passing the law.” (357)
Jews as Ring Leaders of Criminality in London
- Scotsman Patrick Colquhoun, who is famous for the founding of England’s first modern police force, detailed in his objective report the significant scope of Jewish criminality and its central role in facilitating all crime in London.
- 1796 ‘A Treatise on the Police of the Metropolis’ (399)
- His opponents didn’t deny his facts, only his diagnosis of Jews as perpetrators rather than victims. (412)
All Jews are United
- Key Peter Aldag quote: “People who do not sufficiently understand the Jewish Question” mistakenly think that different sects of Jews fight each other. (417)
- Fake Ashkenazi/Sephardi Split
- The two sects united in the London Committee of Deputies of the British Jews and agreed to work together going forward. (396)
- See ‘Fake Ashkenazi/Sephardi Split’ under Quotes.
- Jewish Capitalists hand in hand with Jewish Communists
- According to Disraeli, Jewish capitalists were aligning with Jewish communists
- “[The] most skilful accumulators of property ally themselves with the communists: this peculiar and chosen race touch the hand of all the scum and low castes of Europe.” (468)
- Jewish Capitalists, including bankers, funded the Bolsheviks
- Jew Israel Sieff
- President of the “all-powerful group” PEP
- Political and Economic Planning group (PEP): determined what amounts and kinds of agricultural products could be sold.
- Vice-president and assistant managing director of Marks & Spencer
- Honorary President of the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland.
- Political views: radical left
- “It is even said, based on American publications, that he maintains close ties to the group of Jews — namely Jacob Schiff, Warburg and others — who provided the original financial support to the Bolsheviks and thus kept them in power.” (788)
- Smoking gun for Schiff funding Bolsheviks:
- “Translator’s note: Steed affirms in his memoir that when it came to the securing the Bolsheviks power and international legitimacy, ‘the prime movers were Jacob Schiff, Warburg, and other international financiers, who wished above all to bolster up the Jewish Bolshevists in order to secure a field for German and Jewish exploitation of Russia.” (788)
- Jewish historian Simon Wolf:
- “We all know that the first bankers in the world — Rothschilds — are Jews; we know that they control not only the money market, but also the political destiny of the European world. [...] The Press of Europe is mostly controlled by Jews; the leading editors are Jews. [...] The revolutionary feeling in Europe owed its life and stimulus to Jews...” (598)
- Zionists and Communists
- Zionism is both left-wing (Marxist-socialist) and right-wing. In Aldag’s time, the left wing, embodied by Dr. Weizmann, was the most prominent internationally, according to Jewish researcher Landman. (673)
- Former Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald, a fervent Zionist, was a big fan of Jewish communism.
- “I have been an unswerving hopeful regarding the Moscow Government... We can now take the Moscow Soviet Communist Revolutionary Government under our wing, and clothe it in the furs of apology to shield it from the blasts of criticism.” (697)
- Professor Harold Laski
- A Marxist-Zionist in a leading position in the BBC (766)
- See ‘Godfrey Isaacs’ under ‘BBC’ under ‘Radio’ under Themes.
- Zionist leader Israel Zangwill was a pro-communist.
- “The Zionist leader Israel Zangwill became the spokesman for Bolshevism in Communist meetings as early as 1919. That year, as he explained to a largely Jewish audience in the Albert Hall, Great Britain should not oppose the Soviet Union, but rather it should conclude a pact of friendship with them. This is most forcefully demonstrated in the closing lines of his speech, latterly titled Hands Off Russia:
- Let us intervene in Russia not with arms or blockades, but with food and friendship! Let us leave Russia the right she has proclaimed for all — the right of self-determination.” (794)
- The general Jewish public in Britain supported the Bolsheviks
- “The following is an excerpt from an open letter written by a Jewish woman, which appeared in the Morning Post of March 10th and 11th, 1919:
- ‘It was the Jews who made the revolution possible in Russia. The Jewish youth joyfully devoted themselves to this work of destruction, which precedes a world reformation; they came to England to continue their work…’” (794)
- Prominent Jews in British media and art were both Zionists and Marxist socialists
- Jewish figures like Israel Zangwill, Moses Baritz, and Godfrey Isaacs, who had disproportionate influence, were Zionists and Marxist socialists.
- Supported Zionist causes, while advocating against Germany and for the supposedly anti-Zionist Soviet Union
- See ‘The Jew in Art and Literature’ and ‘Radio’ under Themes
- International Jews supported the Bolshevik Revolution
- The British Foreign Office, under the influence of the Jewish NGO London Committee of Deputies of the British Jews, facilitated the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia
- “In 1904, 1905, 1906 and 1910, the Foreign Office actively worked in favour of the Jews in Russia and each time ensured that nothing was done against them.” (598)
- Note: In the 20th century, after the Soviet Union turned on the Jews, the Marxist Trotskyites would migrate to America and become “right-wing” neoconservatives. Really, they remained committed to the same goal of Jewish power. [pg. 149-150, 159-160, 163-16 of Jewish Power by JJ Goldberg]
- See ‘Powerful Jewish NGOs’ under Parallels.
1840 Damascus case of ritual murder.
- This case is well-documented, perhaps the best-documented in history.
- No reasonable doubt with full uncoerced confessions (472)
Lionel Rothschild's Corruption during Parliament Elections
- The corruption was public knowledge.
- “It must be stressed that the facts conveyed here were published in the newspapers, which is why without doubt they were also public knowledge. What is more, these practices were openly repeated in the years that followed.” (481)
- The accusations were never addressed, let alone refuted.
- “Why was there no defamation claim raised against the owners and editors of the corresponding newspapers, or against the leading Conservatives of the City of London?” (481)
- Formal allegations in the House of Commons were not refuted.
- “Not just the press, but also a few members in the House of Commons, Mr. Bankes, and most of all Mr. Newdegate' — whom we shall return to later — formally repeated these allegations.” (481)
- General corruption at the time
- In 1830, it was an open secret that “more than a third of the seats in Parliament are notoriously purchasable”. (482)
- Rothschild later admitted the corruption.
- “Rothschild himself confirmed the suspicion of bribery at a later date, through his own Statements, as he let it be understood that his election in the City of London had cost him between £20,000 and £25,000.” (483)
- See ‘Lionel Rothschild Used Dirty Tactics, Including Mobs, Intimidation, and Bribes to Win Elections’ under Quotes.
- See ‘Lionel Rothschild’ under Villains.
Petitions: The People Were Against the Jews in 1853
- Proof of petition numbers from each side
- “The month of April brought even better proof: compared with the countless large petitions presented by individuals, towns, cities and communities, only a very few were found in favour of the Jews. July showed the fullest evidence of this prevailing mood, with 1,055 petitions containing 34,525 signatures against the Jews, and only seven petitions containing 450 signatures in their favour.” (522)
Petitions: The People Were Still Against the Jews in 1858
- “In the first months of 1858, the vast majority of the native population continued to be against the Jews being admitted into Parliament, as is shown by the evidence of the petitions sent to the two legislative Houses by cities, districts and private individuals. While around the time of the March 17th and 22nd debates numerous petitions arrived to Parliament that were against the Jewish bill, not a single one arrived that was in favour of the Hebrews.” (536)
- “April 27th, when the Earl of Granville likewise presented a single pro-Jewish petition. But the following day the overwhelming majority made their voices heard, when against 50 pro-Jewish petitions containing 2,793 signatures, a total of 224 anti-Jewish petitions with 11,359 signatures freshly revealed the true will of the people.” (536)
Historical Study Leads to Antisemitism and Bribes to Philosemitism
- People oppose the Jews due to rational investigation, especially historical research; meanwhile, people support the Jews because of money, flattery, bribes, threats, or brainwashed fanaticism.
- The cases of Lord Derby and the Earl of Clancarty highlight this perfectly.
- See ‘’Rational Antisemitism: Historical Evidence Producing Antisemitism’ under Themes.
A Firsthand Report of Jewish London Life in the 1840s
- Around the time of the Jewish emancipation
- From the Translator’s Appendix to Volume 6: A Sketch of Jewish London Life in the 1840s (558)
- Originally from Chapter XVI of John Fisher Murray’s The World of London published in 1848
- Detailed that the Jews were behind coin clipping and especially prostitution rings
- See ‘A Firsthand Report of Jewish London Life in the 1840s’ under Quotes.
Blue Book Document
- Published by the English government in 1877 (577)
- Evidence that the Jews controlled British foreign policy in the 19th century post-emancipation
- The British aggressively intervened for Jewish interests all around the world.
- “A study of the Blue Book likewise leads to a recognition of how so much time was wasted in giving the Romanian and Serbian governments rules of conduct regarding treatment of the Jews. The consuls, the consul generals and every class of diplomatic representative had to draft long reports, while the ministers had to personally and forcefully admonish the sovereigns every so often and, in the case of these admonitions not being heeded, threaten them. All of this took place not to safeguard British interests, but to satisfy the desires of international Jewry. The sheer number of these interventions is clear from the fact that the Blue Book contains no less than some 400 printed pages, with 357 letters, reports, telegrams, etc.” (577)
LCDBJ Minute Books
- The Jewish Charles Emanuel published excerpts from the minute books of the meetings of the London Committee of Deputies of British Jews. (594)
- “Irrefutable proof” that the British government was a tool for the Jews (594)
- The British government intervened around the world for the Jews, acting as their personal security force, including in Damascus, Wallachia, Corfu, Tripoli, Serbia, and Persia, Romania, Turkey, Morocco, Malta, Switzerland, and Russia. (594-8)
- Details:
- Damascus
- The Foreign Office stepped in to protect Jewish vandals of a Jewish murder victim’s memorial plaque. (595)
- Romania
- The Romanians attempted to expel the Jews, and the British government intervened: the expulsion regulations were repealed and the responsible officials fired. (596)
- Corfu
- “In Corfu in 1880, a criminal trial was held against Jews accused of ritual murder after the body of a Greek boy was found in Alexandria, a few weeks before Passover. At the request of his ethnic brethren, the Foreign Office appointed a British Commissioner to take part in the trial. The Jews were acquitted.” (597)
- Malta
- “In Malta in 1892, … a leaflet was publicly sold which accused the Jews of ritual murder, and which urged the populace to keep a close guard over their children. The Jews of Malta, according to general custom, turned to London, with the result that Lord Ripon of the Foreign Office sent instructions to the Governor for the protection of the Jews. Furthermore, at the instigation of the Jews in London, the Archbishop of Westminster asked his colleague in Malta to use his influence to have the leaflet withdrawn. This intervention also had its desired effect.” (597)
- Switzerland
- Evidence of fake Jewish science
- “In the same year, the Jews in Switzerland were disturbed by a bill that would ban the kosher slaughter of cattle [shechita]. If the bill were to be made law, international Jewry feared that this might incentivise other nations to follow suit. And once again it was Lord Rosebery who intervened on behalf of Jewish interests by passing this communication on to Lord Ripon at the Foreign Office. An article was immediately published in the British Medical Journal stating that, according to scientists, the Jewish method of slaughter was the least cruel and most effective, an article which was circulated in Switzerland.” (597)
- The bill was defeated shortly after. (598)
- Russia
- The British government facilitated the Bolshevik Revolution
- “In 1904, 1905, 1906 and 1910, the Foreign Office actively worked in favour of the Jews in Russia and each time ensured that nothing was done against them.” (598)
- Jewish historian Simon Wolf: “We all know that the first bankers in the world — Rothschilds — are Jews; we know that they control not only the money market, but also the political destiny of the European world. [...] The Press of Europe is mostly controlled by Jews; the leading editors are Jews. [...] The revolutionary feeling in Europe owed its life and stimulus to Jews...” (598)
May 1894 Board of Trade Report on Jewish Community and Business
- Report of statistics published by the Board of Trade, summarized four years of investigation to provide information for the Alien Bill debate in Parliament (608)
- Findings:
- Jews were obsessed with the Talmud. (608)
- Jews had dishonest business practices, monopolized large sections of business. (608)
- The English people hated the Jews. (608)
1902 British Government Study Proving Jewish Criminality
- Another detailed and unbiased official government study demonstrating Jewish criminality
- “On January 28th, 1902, the government announced that it would set up a Royal Commission in the near future, which convened for the first time on April 24th, 1902.'”
- The Commission was composed of seven members, including Lord Rothschild, ‘so that the Commission might be recognised as free from all bias against the alien’ and Major Evans-Gordon. The chairmanship was in the hands of Lord James of Hereford. Forty-nine meetings were held. The Commission's activities, including the preparation of the 1,100-page report, spanned a period of just under one and a half years. A total of 175 witnesses and experts were examined and 23,639 questions and answers recorded. The Report of the Commission was completed on August 10th, 1903." (613-614)
- “Very detailed investigations once again confirmed the criminality of the immigrants and the overpopulation of the East End of London, with all of the attendant horrors this caused.” (614)
Cabal of Jews Killed the Aliens Bill of 1904
- The Jew Charles Emanuel provides evidence that a cabal of Jews killed the Aliens Bill of 1904 against the will of the people.
- A group of Jews met with government officials behind closed doors to kill the bill that was in its second reading.
- Charles Immanuel: “A deputation from the Board waited on the Home Secretary and stated its objections to various provisions in the measure, and he promised that their view should be considered. The bill was subsequently withdrawn.” (618)
- For full passage, see ‘Cabal of Jews killed the Aliens Bill of 1904’ in Quotes.
Jews had Cushy Jobs and Were Draft Dodgers during World War I
- The Jewish War Services Committee Report, written by Rabbi Michael Adler (656)
- “According to the official Jewish report, the team [in the Air Force] included a large number of tailors and other tradesmen. The latter were responsible for maintaining the machines and working in the Film and Photographic Unit.” (656)
- Jews had a very low casualty rate (657)
- Jewish newspapers at the time bragged about the Jews' draft dodging, there were riots of Jews over the issue, and there was even a meeting by an official Jewish organization. (659)
- “A mass meeting against deportation and forced conscription into the army was organised by the Foreign Jews Protection Committee.” (659)
Jews Were Offered Other Land, Demanded Palestine
- The following evidence proves that the Jews didn’t have to colonize Palestine because they were offered other areas by the British government. If Israel were only about Jewish safety, the Jews would have taken these safe options, rather than the dangerous area of Palestine.
- “The British government offered the Zionists El Arish, part of so-called Egyptian Palestine, as a replacement for Palestine… government's proposals for the scheme in British East Africa, which were ‘the grant of a considerable tract of land’... The Zionists withheld their decision on this offer until after their leading members all over the world had been consulted… Due to opposition from Jews who wanted Palestine or nothing, the British government's plan was rejected some time later.” (663)
- For the full quote, see ‘Jews Were Offered Other Land, Demanded Palestine’ under Quotes.
- “... 20th May, 1917, Weizmann, who was Chairman, explained in his opening address that the Zionist Movement was ‘never built... on the sufferings of our people in Russia or elsewhere’. Rather, the cause of Zionism was the ‘ineradicable national striving of Jewry to have a home of its own — a national centre, a national home with a national Jewish life.” (666)
Balfour Declaration Issued to Bring World Jewry Behind the Entente
- According to insiders, historians, Jewish Zionist leaders, and journalists
- “A certain Mr. James Malcolm in particular brought the Zionists’ aspirations to Sykes’ attention, and asserted to him and other members of the English and French governments that only the Zionists would be able to bring the USA into the war on the Allied side, after all previous attempts to do so had failed. He further explained to these powerful men that the Zionists were in no way pro-German, but only anti-Russian. Sir Mark Sykes on the British side and Francois Georges-Picot on the French side finally came to the view that securing the co-operation of Zionist Jews was ‘the best and perhaps the only way’ to induce President Wilson to enter the war. This was thought to be all the easier because he listened almost exclusively to the advice of the Zionist Louis Brandeis, a Supreme Court justice. Of course, as part of this ‘quid pro quo contract’ the Jews had to be assured of something in return, which according to their plans could only be Palestine. After long deliberations, the British government commissioned Sir Mark Sykes for the role and an agreement with the Zionists was reached which, with the help of the Foreign Office, was sent out to every place where a Zionist movement could be found. Immediately afterwards, ‘the change in official and public opinion as reflected in the American press in favour of joining the Allies in the War, was as gratifying as it was surprisingly rapid’. Samuel Landman, to whom we owe these previously little-known facts regarding this ‘necessarily secret “gentleman’s” agreement of 1916’, also points out with particular pride that it was the ‘hitherto unsuspectedly powerful forces of Zionist Jews in America and elsewhere’ who had brought America into the war.” (664-5)
- “Landman should actually have precise knowledge of this, since he had been actively working in Zionism for years and was the solicitor and secretary of the Zionist Organisation from 1917 to 1922.” (664)
- More evidence: “Elsewhere, we find Henry Wickham Steed, the former editor of the Times, writing almost the same account of events as Landman had. That Steed was complete unconnected to Landman is supported by the fact that Steed published his information twelve years prior to Landman’s essay and, unlike Landman, probably received his information directly from the government, i.e. the other contracting party in the agreement. This can be inferred because as Steed’s memoir continually demonstrates, the journalist maintained the best of relations with the government. Finally, this version of events as presented by Landman and Steed is also supported by Temperley.” (666)
- Harold Temperley also concurred.
- He was a historian of modern diplomatic history who, moreover, specialized in British diplomatic documents of the era. He was even an official historian of the British government, being commissioned to write the official history of the Paris Peace Conference of 1919. Best of all, he was “an advisor in 1921 to Arthur Balfour at the League of Nations.” [Harold Temperley - Wikipedia]
- Temperley: “Support of Zionist ambitions, indeed, promised much for the cause of the Entente. Quite naturally Jewish sympathies were to a great extent anti-Russian, and therefore in favour of the Central Powers... the German General Staff desired to attach Jewish support yet more closely to the German side. With their wide outlook on possibilities they seem to have urged, early in 1916, the advantages of promising Jewish restoration to Palestine under an arrangement to be made between Zionists and Turkey, backed by a German guarantee... In fact in September 1917 the German Government were making the most serious efforts to capture the Zionist movement.
- Another most cogent reason why the policy of the Declaration should be adopted by the Allies lay in the state of Russia herself. Russian Jews had been secretly active on behalf of the Central Powers from the first; they had become the chief agents of German pacifist propaganda; by 1917 they had done much in preparation for that general disintegration of Russian national life, later recognized as the revolution. It was believed that if Great Britain declared for the fulfilment of Zionist aspirations in Palestine under her own pledge, one effect would be to bring Russian Jewry to the cause of the Entente.
- It was believed, also, that such a declaration would have a potent influence upon world Jewry in the same way, and secure for the Entente the aid of Jewish financial interests. It was believed, further, that it would greatly influence American opinion in favour of the Allies. Such were the chief considerations which, during the later part of 1916 and the next ten months of 1917, impelled the British Government towards making a contract with Jewry.” (668)
Jewish Chronicle: Jews Controlled British Policy Behind Closed Doors
- “On August 13th, 1937, the Jewish Chronicle published an in-depth article, according to which the division of Palestine had already been discussed and an agreement reached between Weizmann and the then Colonial Minister and great friend of the Jews, Ormsby-Gore, before the Palestine Commission set up by the British had even had the chance to make its suggestions regarding the issue. So here again one can see the Jewish conspiracy behind the curtain of public life prearranging outcomes before they happen and the confirmation that England dares do nothing without the prior approval of international Jewry.” (673)
Oligarchical Nature of Parliament
- “As Lt. Col. Lane outlines in his book, The Alien Menace (1934), in the Parliament of 1924-1925 no fewer than 694 companies were represented by 766 directors. The Parliament of 1932 had 691 members and the 1934 Parliament had 581 members, representing 646 and 546 companies respectively.” (710)
Jewish Singular Loyalty to Israel
- An example of the fact that Jews see themselves as Jews first, and, more often than not, as Jews only. They don’t have “dual-loyalty” as much as singular loyalty: to the Jewish people.
- Regarding the “British” industrialist, the Jew Alfred Mond
In 1938, Jews Controlled the British Banks
- In Britain in 1938, in the 'Big Five' banks, there were Jews in director-level positions.
- Sir Victor Schuster in the National Provincial Bank Ltd. (capital £60,000,000)
- Lord Bearsted in Lloyds Bank Ltd. (capital £74,000,000)
- Sir Albert Stern in the Midland Bank Ltd. (capital £45,200,000)
- Lord Goschen and Sir George Schuster in Westminster Bank Ltd. (capital £33,000,000
- Lord Melchett in Barclays Bank (capital £20,000,000)
- Source: Stock Exchange Year Book 1938, p. 567. (731)
Jewish Control of the British Film Industry
- “Gaumont-British [company controlled by Jew Isidore Ostrer] currently controls around 350 cinemas in the UK, which are estimated to be visited by around three million people per week.” (749)
- For a full breakdown, see Aldag’s chapter The Judaisation of Film (745-750), as it contains lists demonstrating the Jewish element.
Jew Sir Lionel Faudel Phillip’s Propaganda Influence
- Phillip had a prominent position in the Official British Council for influencing culture, producing propaganda.
- “According to the British Council's own reports, [Phillip] has a preeminent position in this institution. The British Council is a largely state-backed organisation which exists to spread British culture and values abroad, including the creation of cultural propaganda through appropriate events. It is no secret that its end goal is political.” (759)
- BBC
- “One of the first directors of the British Broadcasting Corporation, or BBC as it is called, was Godfrey Isaacs…”
- Lieutenant-Colonel Arthur Henry Lane “revealed how, right from the start of the BBC being founded, Jews and their socialist friends — e.g. Lord Sankey, the Archbishop of York and the Jewish Marxist-Zionist Professor Harold Laski — were in leading positions within the corporation.” (766)
- Average number of Jewish programs per week on the BBC
- “Taking all of this into account gives us a weekly average of 10 programmes for 1936, 20 for 1937 and 30 for 1938. Nothing could better illuminate the spirit of the BBC than these stark figures. Apparently the Jewish-themed broadcasts were significantly increased in 1939, because according to the first issue of the Jewish Chronicle for 1939 (the January 6th issue), the number of such broadcasts for the following week amounted to 40.” (766)
- Even had a program just for Jews (766-7)
- The Press
- The press had enormous power over minds
- “... the average Englishman is only too willing to believe what his newspaper tells him, and alternative views are either rejected outright as untrue, or at least treated with skepticism.” (768)
- The British Press had 7 million daily readers (768)
- The newspaper industry was dominated by the following six major groups:
- Odhams Press, Beaverbrook Group, Berry Group, News Chronicle Group, Daily Mail Group, Westminster Press (768)
- All were essentially controlled by Jews
- “In all of these corporations we will either find Jews in leading positions or we feel their spirit.” (769)
- Example: Odhams Press
- The chairman and managing director of Odhams Press: Jew Baron Southwood of Fernhurst (769)
- Published The People newspaper: circulation of over three million copies (769)
- Published the Daily Herald
- 2 million daily circulation (769)
- Official organ of the Marxist Labour Party (769)
- Jew Alexander Easterman
- Literary editor and deputy foreign editor on the staff until 1938 (769)
National Amalgamated Furnishing Trades Association Press Release
- Press release after investigation:
- “Records will prove that an extraordinary proportion of those in the furniture trade. It is a known fact that furniture manufacture and distribution is controlled almost exclusively by Jewish employers; Fascist propagandists, because of the low wages and excessive hours of employment prevailing in factories, find such vicious exploitation a fertile ground for anti-Semitism.” (778)
PEP: Jewish Control of British Agriculture
- The Political and Economic Planning group (PEP) determined what amounts and kinds of agricultural products could be sold. The result: food wasted while people starved (787)
- “All of this is only possible because big capital works with the PEP group to become the ultimate master of the free peasantry.” (788)
- “‘The effect of the whole transaction,’ Belloc wrote, ‘was that masses of English land had been transferred from the old great Landlords to the banks, and that the men who actually tilled the soil and had adventured their small capital in the development of small farms, were left paying tribute to the money-lending machine which modern banking has become.’” (788)
- Jew Israel Sieff
- President of the “all-powerful group” PEP
- Vice-president and assistant managing director of Marks & Spencer
- Honorary President of the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland.
- Political views: radical left
- “It is even said, based on American publications, that he maintains close ties to the group of Jews — namely Jacob Schiff, Warburg and others — who provided the original financial support to the Bolsheviks and thus kept them in power.” (788)
- Smoking gun for Schiff funding Bolsheviks:
- “Translator’s note: Steed affirms in his memoir that when it came to the securing the Bolsheviks power and international legitimacy, ‘the prime movers were Jacob Schiff, Warburg, and other international financiers, who wished above all to bolster up the Jewish Bolshevists in order to secure a field for German and Jewish exploitation of Russia’.” (788)
- More PEP directors:
- Lord Melchett
- Lord Eustace Percy.
- Had “fallen completely into the Jews’ orbit.” (788)
- “During his time working as an attaché at the British Embassy in Washington, he was close friends with the Zionist Professor Felix Frankfurter, who has recently been appointed Associate Justice of the Supreme Court with the help of his patron Roosevelt.” (788)
- Jewry was also behind the League of Nations
- “As late as 1937, the Count of Saint-Aulaire, the former French ambassador to London, wrote the following: Are we not paying too great an honour to freemasonry when we attribute to it the greatest share in the genesis of the League of Nations and in responsibility for its acts? Is not this secret society a society with limited responsibility, not only by reason of its mental weakness, but also because it is, above all else, the instrument of forces more secret still and more to be feared? Is it not unjustly accused of all the sins of Jewry? And if freemasonry is but an instrument, then President Wilson was but the instrument of an instrument.” (796)