Quotes (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag) - Revision history

Craig Holly: /* Sir John Bernard */

2026-02-22T18:19:20Z

Sir John Bernard

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 22 February 2026
Line 160:		Line 160:
	*Jews don’t do productive labor, only export, take bread from Gentile mouths<blockquote>For this reason, in the infancy of the trade of any country, it is right to encourage the Jews to come and settle amongst them: as the manufacturers have not then money of their own sufficient for carrying their manufacture to any great extent, and as the native merchants have not a foreign correspondence settled, perhaps, in those countries where some of their manufactures may be sold to the best advantage. But in a country where trade and commerce have been fully and long established, where the manufacturers have money sufficient of their own, or of their friends, to carry their manufactures to the utmost extent, and where the native merchants have a correspondence settled in every foreign country where it is possible to carry on any commerce, and consequently must know where every sort of manufacture may be sold to the best advantage: in such a country, I say, it is madness, if not worse, to put Jews or any other foreigners upon an equal footing with natives, because it only enables the former to take the bread, or a part of the bread, out of the mouths of the latter, without increasing in the least the national trade or commerce; for no Jew, any more than a native, will export more of your manufacture than he can sell to advantage, and so much your own native merchants will always export, if there were not a Jew in the kingdom… ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n307/mode/2up 308-309])</blockquote>		*Jews don’t do productive labor, only export, take bread from Gentile mouths<blockquote>For this reason, in the infancy of the trade of any country, it is right to encourage the Jews to come and settle amongst them: as the manufacturers have not then money of their own sufficient for carrying their manufacture to any great extent, and as the native merchants have not a foreign correspondence settled, perhaps, in those countries where some of their manufactures may be sold to the best advantage. But in a country where trade and commerce have been fully and long established, where the manufacturers have money sufficient of their own, or of their friends, to carry their manufactures to the utmost extent, and where the native merchants have a correspondence settled in every foreign country where it is possible to carry on any commerce, and consequently must know where every sort of manufacture may be sold to the best advantage: in such a country, I say, it is madness, if not worse, to put Jews or any other foreigners upon an equal footing with natives, because it only enables the former to take the bread, or a part of the bread, out of the mouths of the latter, without increasing in the least the national trade or commerce; for no Jew, any more than a native, will export more of your manufacture than he can sell to advantage, and so much your own native merchants will always export, if there were not a Jew in the kingdom… ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n307/mode/2up 308-309])</blockquote>
	*Jews will become masters of Gentiles<blockquote>They will probably leave the laborious part of all manufactures and mechanical trade to the poor Christians, but they will be the paramount masters… ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n307/mode/2up 309])</blockquote>		*Jews will become masters of Gentiles<blockquote>They will probably leave the laborious part of all manufactures and mechanical trade to the poor Christians, but they will be the paramount masters… ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n307/mode/2up 309])</blockquote>
			*Jewish wealth is international in character, sucks blood from nation<blockquote>This, therefore, could be of no advantage to our trade or manufacturers: it would only transfer the profit upon 200,000/. worth of goods yearly from our native English merchants to our naturalized Jews; and this I must look on as a loss to the nation, because I think we are as yet a Christian nation; the estate got by an Englishman we are sure will remain here: but a Jew, though naturalized, may be here today and gone tomorrow: when he has got an estate here, he may go and live upon it in a climate which he thinks more agreeable to his constitution. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n375/mode/2up 376-377])</blockquote>

	=== The Earl of Egmont ===		=== The Earl of Egmont ===

Craig Holly: /* Sir Edmund Isham */

2026-02-22T18:09:52Z

Sir Edmund Isham

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 22 February 2026
Line 153:		Line 153:
	=== Sir Edmund Isham ===		=== Sir Edmund Isham ===
	*Jewish problem as racial problem<blockquote>But if those of true English blood have not now the power to prevent opening the sluice for letting the torrent in upon us, can we hope, that they will have power enough to shut it up, after the torrent is broke in, and the Jews are become possessed, not only of all the wealth, but of many, perhaps most of the land-estates of the kingdom? This hope, I am sure, is much more chimerical than the danger of our being overwhelmed by the torrent before we begin to think of putting a stop to it. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n305/mode/2up 307]-[https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n307/mode/2up 308])</blockquote>		*Jewish problem as racial problem<blockquote>But if those of true English blood have not now the power to prevent opening the sluice for letting the torrent in upon us, can we hope, that they will have power enough to shut it up, after the torrent is broke in, and the Jews are become possessed, not only of all the wealth, but of many, perhaps most of the land-estates of the kingdom? This hope, I am sure, is much more chimerical than the danger of our being overwhelmed by the torrent before we begin to think of putting a stop to it. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n305/mode/2up 307]-[https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n307/mode/2up 308])</blockquote>
			*The Jews are different from European refugees like Germans because they would not assimilate, would contend for power as Jews<blockquote>I must therefore, Sir, look upon this Bill to be in effect a Bill for the general naturalization of the Jews; and considering what infinite numbers of them are spread over the whole face of the earth, I am persuaded their numbers will increase so fast in this country, and they will get such a considerable part of our land-estates into their possession, that they will soon contend for power as well as property. Let us consider, Sir, that the Jews are not like French refugees, or German Protestants: these in a generation or two become so incorporated with us, that there is no distinguishing them from the rest of the people: their children, or grand-children, are no longer French or Germans, or of the French or German nation, but become truly English, and deem themselves to be of the English nation. But the unconverted Jews can never incorporate with us: they must forever remain Jews, and will always deem themselves to be of the Hebrew not the English nation. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n371/mode/2up 372])</blockquote>

	=== Sir John Bernard ===		=== Sir John Bernard ===

Craig Holly: Belloc quote about Jews polluting blood

2026-02-21T20:58:25Z

Belloc quote about Jews polluting blood

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:58, 21 February 2026
Line 628:		Line 628:
	* Explaining the totalitarian Judaization of the government, press, City		* Explaining the totalitarian Judaization of the government, press, City
	<blockquote>Every English Government had (and has) its quota of Jews. They had entered the diplomatic service and the House of Lords; they swarmed in the House of Commons, in the Universities, in all the Government offices save the Foreign Office (and even there representatives of the Jewish nation have recently entered); they were exceedingly powerful in the Press: they were all-powerful in the City. No custom unsympathetic to their race, from the duel to popular clamour, survived. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/454/mode/2up 678])</blockquote>		<blockquote>Every English Government had (and has) its quota of Jews. They had entered the diplomatic service and the House of Lords; they swarmed in the House of Commons, in the Universities, in all the Government offices save the Foreign Office (and even there representatives of the Jewish nation have recently entered); they were exceedingly powerful in the Press: they were all-powerful in the City. No custom unsympathetic to their race, from the duel to popular clamour, survived. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/454/mode/2up 678])</blockquote>

			=== Jews Polluted Noble Blood ===

			* Few of the families were unblemished, some became entirely Jewish in genetics, character<blockquote>After two generations of this, with the opening of the twentieth century those of the great territorial English families in which there was no Jewish blood were the exception. In nearly all of them was the strain more or less marked, in some of them so strong that though the name was still an English name and the traditions those of a purely English lineage of the long past, the physique and character had become wholly Jewish and the members of the family were taken for Jews whenever they travelled in countries where the gentry had not yet suffered or enjoyed this admixture. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/452/mode/2up 676-677])</blockquote>

	== Beverley Nichols: England No Longer Cares about England ==		== Beverley Nichols: England No Longer Cares about England ==

Craig Holly: /* Intermarriage as a Weapon */

2025-11-17T02:51:48Z

Intermarriage as a Weapon

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:51, 17 November 2025
Line 253:		Line 253:

	== Intermarriage as a Weapon ==		== Intermarriage as a Weapon ==
	* The following is an excellent Aldag quote about the question of whether the Jews intermarry purposefully as a weapon against their enemies or not. Ultimately, the intention doesn’t matter, only the effect.		* The following is an excellent Aldag quote about the question of whether the Jews intermarry purposefully as a weapon against their enemies or not. Ultimately, the intention doesn’t matter, only the effect.
	<blockquote>The Jews' tactics of attrition undoubtedly include the mixing of Aryan and Jewish blood. It is probably irrelevant to discuss whether these intermarriages took place consciously with this aim in mind. In general, when it comes to the Jewish Question, it is not necessary to discuss whether some process or other to advance Judaism in a country has taken place intentionally according to a wellthought-out plan. We believe that this does happen, but the only thing that matters when deciding on countermeasures is to assess the consequences of the various Jewish behaviours and the Jewish system as a whole on the future of a people. If these prove to be detrimental, then they should be combatted purely out of the instinct for self-preservation, with no need to consider the question of whether this damage is intentional or not.		<blockquote>The Jews' tactics of attrition undoubtedly include the mixing of Aryan and Jewish blood. It is probably irrelevant to discuss whether these intermarriages took place consciously with this aim in mind. In general, when it comes to the Jewish Question, it is not necessary to discuss whether some process or other to advance Judaism in a country has taken place intentionally according to a wellthought-out plan. We believe that this does happen, but the only thing that matters when deciding on countermeasures is to assess the consequences of the various Jewish behaviours and the Jewish system as a whole on the future of a people. If these prove to be detrimental, then they should be combatted purely out of the instinct for self-preservation, with no need to consider the question of whether this damage is intentional or not.

	In our opinion, we do not need to decide whether intermarriage was part of a well-thought-out system for weakening the host nation, beginning mainly through strategic unions with the ruling class. One could respond that the Jew himself — as we will see later — believes in keeping his race pure and even considers it necessary for his people’s future. However, a supporter of the theory that the Jews have a premeditated plan for world domination could counter this by saying that in every struggle individual members of a group have to sacrifice themselves for the greater good and so bloodlines of Jewish families must perish together with families of the host nation they have contaminated, unless the inferior race gains the upper hand in such mixing. We see that this mixing would also have an internal logic, or particular benefit, of its own, but there is no space here to go into this in more detail. We are merely stating that, regardless of whatever view is held, throughout recorded history intermarriage has always been one of the ways in which Judah gradually attains supremacy in a polity. Given all of this, the most practical method (and the only method that works) is to decide to combat the Jews based solely on the result of their general behaviour, because in the fight for the existence of a people, a defensive act cannot depend on the moral intention of the people harmed by the influence of an alien body: here the sole and exclusive decision to be made is for the preservation of the people, for which every means must necessarily be justified. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n389/mode/2up 390])</blockquote>		In our opinion, we do not need to decide whether intermarriage was part of a well-thought-out system for weakening the host nation, beginning mainly through strategic unions with the ruling class. One could respond that the Jew himself — as we will see later — believes in keeping his race pure and even considers it necessary for his people’s future. However, a supporter of the theory that the Jews have a premeditated plan for world domination could counter this by saying that in every struggle individual members of a group have to sacrifice themselves for the greater good and so bloodlines of Jewish families must perish together with families of the host nation they have contaminated, unless the inferior race gains the upper hand in such mixing. We see that this mixing would also have an internal logic, or particular benefit, of its own, but there is no space here to go into this in more detail. We are merely stating that, regardless of whatever view is held, throughout recorded history intermarriage has always been one of the ways in which Judah gradually attains supremacy in a polity. Given all of this, the most practical method (and the only method that works) is to decide to combat the Jews based solely on the result of their general behaviour, because in the fight for the existence of a people, a defensive act cannot depend on the moral intention of the people harmed by the influence of an alien body: here the sole and exclusive decision to be made is for the preservation of the people, for which every means must necessarily be justified. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n389/mode/2up 390])</blockquote>

			* See [[Parallels (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Intermarriage of Elites with Jews\|Intermarriage of Elites with Jews]] under Parallels.
			* See [[Themes (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Intermarriage\|Intermarriage]] under 'Jewish Tactics' under Themes.

	== Fake Ashkenazi/Sephardi Split ==		== Fake Ashkenazi/Sephardi Split ==

Craig Holly at 05:09, 9 November 2025

2025-11-09T05:09:32Z

Craig Holly: /* William Northey */

2025-11-06T03:30:37Z

William Northey

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:30, 6 November 2025
Line 148:		Line 148:
	** From translator’s Appendix I: Selected Parliamentary Speeches Opposing the ‘Jew Bill’ ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n367/mode/2up 368])		** From translator’s Appendix I: Selected Parliamentary Speeches Opposing the ‘Jew Bill’ ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n367/mode/2up 368])
	** Speech of Mr. William Northey, delivered in the House of Commons, May 7th, 1753. Reproduced from Cobbett’s Parliamentary History, Vol. XIV, pp. 1366-1373.		** Speech of Mr. William Northey, delivered in the House of Commons, May 7th, 1753. Reproduced from Cobbett’s Parliamentary History, Vol. XIV, pp. 1366-1373.
	***One of the most affecting quotes of the book<blockquote>Sir; I hope some of the gentlemen, who are advocates for this Bill, will rise up and inform the House, what terrible crime the people of this kingdom have committed; for I must suppose, that they have been guilty of some heinous offence, because we have of late had some sort of Bill offered every year to parliament for depriving them of their birthright: I say, depriving them, Sir; for the communication of a privilege is, in so far as that communication reaches, a taking it away from those who had before the sole right to it. Attempts have formerly been made to rob them of their birthright as Englishmen, but this Bill I must look on as an attempt to rob them of their birthright as Christians. We know what a curse Esau brought upon himself and his posterity, by selling his birthright to his brother Jacob for a mess of pottage, when he was faint and at the point of dying for hunger: his posterity were to serve the posterity of Jacob: ought we not to fear, that this may be the fate of our posterity, as we are now about to sell our birthright to the posterity of that same Jacob? Sell, I should not say, Sir, for we are going to act more foolishly than Esau: he sold his birthright for a mess of pottage, and when he was under a most urgent necessity: but we are going to give it away for nothing, and when we are under no necessity. Our national debt is, it is true, become monstrously great, so great that, I believe, we should be under great difficulty to find means for supporting another war, should such a misfortune soon happen; but till then we can be under no necessity, and even then we should not, I think, part with out birthright for nothing. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n367/mode/2up 368])</blockquote>		***One of the most affecting quotes of the book<blockquote>Sir; I hope some of the gentlemen, who are advocates for this Bill, will rise up and inform the House, what terrible crime the people of this kingdom have committed; for I must suppose, that they have been guilty of some heinous offence, because we have of late had some sort of Bill offered every year to parliament for depriving them of their birthright: I say, depriving them, Sir; for the communication of a privilege is, in so far as that communication reaches, a taking it away from those who had before the sole right to it. Attempts have formerly been made to rob them of their birthright as Englishmen, but this Bill I must look on as an attempt to rob them of their birthright as Christians. We know what a curse Esau brought upon himself and his posterity, by selling his birthright to his brother Jacob for a mess of pottage, when he was faint and at the point of dying for hunger: his posterity were to serve the posterity of Jacob: ought we not to fear, that this may be the fate of our posterity, as we are now about to sell our birthright to the posterity of that same Jacob? Sell, I should not say, Sir, for we are going to act more foolishly than Esau: he sold his birthright for a mess of pottage, and when he was under a most urgent necessity: but we are going to give it away for nothing, and when we are under no necessity. Our national debt is, it is true, become monstrously great, so great that, I believe, we should be under great difficulty to find means for supporting another war, should such a misfortune soon happen; but till then we can be under no necessity, and even then we should not, I think, part with out birthright for nothing. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n367/mode/2up 368])</blockquote>
	***Accusation of proponents of naturalization being bribed<blockquote>For could it ever have been expected, that what they have so often offered such large sums of money for, should at last be freely granted for nothing, and even without their asking, so far as appears, and what I indeed believe to be really the case? But whatever I believe, whatever may be known by some gentlemen in this House, it will not be believed without doors [i.e. outside of Parliament] that such a signal favour has been granted for nothing: it will be suspected, that a large sum has been paid for it, and as this is kept secret, as no part of this sum is to be applied either to the public service, or to the discharge of our national debt, the people without doors will conclude, that though they do not sell, they are sold, which will tend to raise a popular discontent against our present administration… ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n367/mode/2up 369])</blockquote>		***Accusation of proponents of naturalization being bribed<blockquote>For could it ever have been expected, that what they have so often offered such large sums of money for, should at last be freely granted for nothing, and even without their asking, so far as appears, and what I indeed believe to be really the case? But whatever I believe, whatever may be known by some gentlemen in this House, it will not be believed without doors [i.e. outside of Parliament] that such a signal favour has been granted for nothing: it will be suspected, that a large sum has been paid for it, and as this is kept secret, as no part of this sum is to be applied either to the public service, or to the discharge of our national debt, the people without doors will conclude, that though they do not sell, they are sold, which will tend to raise a popular discontent against our present administration… ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n367/mode/2up 369])</blockquote>

Craig Holly: /* The Earl of Egmont */

2025-11-02T23:03:57Z

The Earl of Egmont

Show changes

Craig Holly: /* Violet’s Petition */

2025-11-02T22:19:44Z

Violet’s Petition

Show changes

Craig Holly: /* Historian Hilaire Belloc Regarding Worldwide Jewish Spies */

2025-11-02T20:00:25Z

Historian Hilaire Belloc Regarding Worldwide Jewish Spies

Craig Holly: /* Why did Lord Derby Change Sides? */

2025-11-02T18:53:29Z

Why did Lord Derby Change Sides?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:53, 2 November 2025
Line 537:		Line 537:
	<blockquote>I do not defend the conduct of Lord Derby, who has agreed to a measure contrary to his principles, because I think he ought to have appealed to the country. I see, in the form of this measure, that it is the intention of its framers to give this House time to reflect, which, in reality, is a recognition of the fact that the country ought to have been appealed to. I cannot say anything in condemnation of the principle of this Bill, and of its tendency to destroy the Christian character of this House, that I have not already ventured to state; but when the conduct of Lord Derby is assailed, I cannot bear all the imputations which are heaped upon him, without calling attention to the difficulties of his position. Now, who has been the main promoter of this infraction of the Christian character of Parliament on this side of the House? Why, the Chancellor of the Exchequer [Disraeli]. We know that the Chancellor of the Exchequer — himself of Jewish extraction — fosters towards the Jewish race feelings which one can trace in almost every work of fiction which he has written. Especially do we find that feeling honestly and frankly declared in the chapter which he has interpolated in his biography of Lord George Bentinck. He claims as the right of the Jewish race the government of the other races of mankind, and claims for them this supremacy, whilst they remain in the present state of rebellion against their own true King...		<blockquote>I do not defend the conduct of Lord Derby, who has agreed to a measure contrary to his principles, because I think he ought to have appealed to the country. I see, in the form of this measure, that it is the intention of its framers to give this House time to reflect, which, in reality, is a recognition of the fact that the country ought to have been appealed to. I cannot say anything in condemnation of the principle of this Bill, and of its tendency to destroy the Christian character of this House, that I have not already ventured to state; but when the conduct of Lord Derby is assailed, I cannot bear all the imputations which are heaped upon him, without calling attention to the difficulties of his position. Now, who has been the main promoter of this infraction of the Christian character of Parliament on this side of the House? Why, the Chancellor of the Exchequer [Disraeli]. We know that the Chancellor of the Exchequer — himself of Jewish extraction — fosters towards the Jewish race feelings which one can trace in almost every work of fiction which he has written. Especially do we find that feeling honestly and frankly declared in the chapter which he has interpolated in his biography of Lord George Bentinck. He claims as the right of the Jewish race the government of the other races of mankind, and claims for them this supremacy, whilst they remain in the present state of rebellion against their own true King...

	When, therefore, I see sitting on these benches, and taking a leading part among the members of this party, one holding these opinions, who has declared them, and uses his influence to carry them into effect, I will not hear Lord Derby's difficulties underrated in regard to this question. I have seen several leading Members of the Conservative Party brought over to his opinions by the Chancellor of the Exchequer. And when the noble Lord at the head of the India Board seceded from his noble father's opinions on this question, and joined the Chancellor of the Exchequer, I felt that Lord Derby's position, sooner or later, might become intolerable, and that there was great danger that by degrees he would be forced from the high position which he has held for many years, as leader of the great party whose pride it still is to be the defenders of the Christian character of Parliament and of the State. In my anger I will have justice — I will not hear Lord Derby's difficulties undervalued; and although I lament that he has succumbed, I see in this a manifestation of a weakness, which is natural, however much it is to be deplored. (545-546)</blockquote>		When, therefore, I see sitting on these benches, and taking a leading part among the members of this party, one holding these opinions, who has declared them, and uses his influence to carry them into effect, I will not hear Lord Derby's difficulties underrated in regard to this question. I have seen several leading Members of the Conservative Party brought over to his opinions by the Chancellor of the Exchequer. And when the noble Lord at the head of the India Board seceded from his noble father's opinions on this question, and joined the Chancellor of the Exchequer, I felt that Lord Derby's position, sooner or later, might become intolerable, and that there was great danger that by degrees he would be forced from the high position which he has held for many years, as leader of the great party whose pride it still is to be the defenders of the Christian character of Parliament and of the State. In my anger I will have justice — I will not hear Lord Derby's difficulties undervalued; and although I lament that he has succumbed, I see in this a manifestation of a weakness, which is natural, however much it is to be deplored. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n543/mode/2up 545]-[https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/390/mode/2up 546])</blockquote>
	* Aldag speculates further about Lord Derby’s motivations		* Aldag speculates further about Lord Derby’s motivations
	<blockquote>Perhaps his reasoning can be explained from the perspective of a desire to keep his position at all costs, or because pressure had been exerted on him by the Jews or the Jews’ supporters. Disraeli was part of his cabinet, as during that period he had risen to become the leader of the Conservatives, so he would have been able to undermine the ancient bastion against Judaism from the inside. It was not for nothing that some newspapers wrote that the Conservative Party had had to surrender itself to a Jew, in order to get new ideas. In these bitter words there is a lot of truth, because it is only this way that it has come to be possible that within the English Conservative Party today one finds theories that can only be Jewish in origin. (554)</blockquote>		<blockquote>Perhaps his reasoning can be explained from the perspective of a desire to keep his position at all costs, or because pressure had been exerted on him by the Jews or the Jews’ supporters. Disraeli was part of his cabinet, as during that period he had risen to become the leader of the Conservatives, so he would have been able to undermine the ancient bastion against Judaism from the inside. It was not for nothing that some newspapers wrote that the Conservative Party had had to surrender itself to a Jew, in order to get new ideas. In these bitter words there is a lot of truth, because it is only this way that it has come to be possible that within the English Conservative Party today one finds theories that can only be Jewish in origin. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n553/mode/2up 554])</blockquote>
	* Aldag had previously speculated that the power of the press could have been the largest factor, as the Jews, forcing a constiutional crisis, could have destroyed the government, or even provoked a French Revolution style attack on the House of Lords.		* Aldag had previously speculated that the power of the press could have been the largest factor, as the Jews, forcing a constiutional crisis, could have destroyed the government, or even provoked a French Revolution style attack on the House of Lords.
	<blockquote>What today is not wished to be seen in most spheres of England, threatened to happen: an unprecedented constitutional crisis. In the most irresponsible way, the Jews and their friends fanned the flames in their newspapers against the House of Lords and demanded more or less openly a violent intervention into the rights of the Lords, whose undignified fate can be partly explained by this. (446)</blockquote>		<blockquote>What today is not wished to be seen in most spheres of England, threatened to happen: an unprecedented constitutional crisis. In the most irresponsible way, the Jews and their friends fanned the flames in their newspapers against the House of Lords and demanded more or less openly a violent intervention into the rights of the Lords, whose undignified fate can be partly explained by this. (446)</blockquote>
Line 563:		Line 563:
	All of this certainly contributed to the gradual imposition of his leadership on the Conservatives. But this seems to have only been possible because the Tories’ previously fundamental ideals had outlived their usefulness, or because the Tories were already so far removed from these ideals that there was virtually nothing left of the true conservatism of the age of Charles I. But be this as it may, it cannot be denied that the ideals of the Conservative Party found their representation in a man who until his dying moment always proclaimed that he was, and would always be, a Jew. In other words, he was a foreigner who, as Raymond underscores, ‘often made gross mistakes’ when he ‘attempted to think in English terms’. Therefore we believe, alongside O’Connor, that under Disraeli’s leadership the Conservatives distanced themselves considerably from the ‘national ideals of the real Englishman’ and that these politicians ‘were not Englishmen or Conservatives, but strictly Disraelites.’		All of this certainly contributed to the gradual imposition of his leadership on the Conservatives. But this seems to have only been possible because the Tories’ previously fundamental ideals had outlived their usefulness, or because the Tories were already so far removed from these ideals that there was virtually nothing left of the true conservatism of the age of Charles I. But be this as it may, it cannot be denied that the ideals of the Conservative Party found their representation in a man who until his dying moment always proclaimed that he was, and would always be, a Jew. In other words, he was a foreigner who, as Raymond underscores, ‘often made gross mistakes’ when he ‘attempted to think in English terms’. Therefore we believe, alongside O’Connor, that under Disraeli’s leadership the Conservatives distanced themselves considerably from the ‘national ideals of the real Englishman’ and that these politicians ‘were not Englishmen or Conservatives, but strictly Disraelites.’

	But not only had the principles of the Conservative Party been changed, but those of England. The general social situation found itself in the throes of transformation. With the abolition of customs tariffs on grain, agriculture was ruined, a situation which is still the case to this day, as we shall see further on. Before the days of Free Trade the peasant was all-important; after it, he was nothing. The introduction of Free Trade saw the perishing of a healthy peasantry that had been the pride of England. From that point onwards, the whole life of the country has been ruled solely from the point of view of money. (580)</blockquote>		But not only had the principles of the Conservative Party been changed, but those of England. The general social situation found itself in the throes of transformation. With the abolition of customs tariffs on grain, agriculture was ruined, a situation which is still the case to this day, as we shall see further on. Before the days of Free Trade the peasant was all-important; after it, he was nothing. The introduction of Free Trade saw the perishing of a healthy peasantry that had been the pride of England. From that point onwards, the whole life of the country has been ruled solely from the point of view of money. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n579/mode/2up 580])</blockquote>

	== Late 19th Century Opposition to Jews ==		== Late 19th Century Opposition to Jews ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:09, 9 November 2025
Line 62:		Line 62:

	Moreover, the Hebrews had a huge advantage over all other foreigners because they never left their host nation, whereas other foreign peoples only stayed long enough to make their fortune and then return with that fortune to their native soil, ‘peaceably to enjoy their estate’. The Jews, on the other hand, having no native country to which to return, stayed where they were with their wealth.” ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/215/mode/2up 186])</blockquote>		Moreover, the Hebrews had a huge advantage over all other foreigners because they never left their host nation, whereas other foreign peoples only stayed long enough to make their fortune and then return with that fortune to their native soil, ‘peaceably to enjoy their estate’. The Jews, on the other hand, having no native country to which to return, stayed where they were with their wealth.” ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/215/mode/2up 186])</blockquote>
	* See ‘[[Villains (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Menasseh ben Israel\|Menasseh ben Israel]]’ under Villains.		* See [[Villains (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Menasseh ben Israel\|Menasseh ben Israel]] under Villains.

	== William Prynne at Whitehall Conference ==		== William Prynne at Whitehall Conference ==
Line 198:		Line 198:
	=== The Danger of Jewish Spies ===		=== The Danger of Jewish Spies ===
	<blockquote>...we Shall find, that no People on Earth are more apt to betray Secrets and communicate private Intelligence, from one Country to another than the Jews, on Condition that they are well paid for it. They are a People who by their Religion are rendered indifferent, if not directly opposite to all Christians of what Denomination soever; and their natural Thirst of Lucre makes them careless which Party they betray, so that they can avail themselves thereby. Though to do them Justice, they generally take Care to advantage the highest Bidder by their Information. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/168/mode/2up 326])</blockquote>		<blockquote>...we Shall find, that no People on Earth are more apt to betray Secrets and communicate private Intelligence, from one Country to another than the Jews, on Condition that they are well paid for it. They are a People who by their Religion are rendered indifferent, if not directly opposite to all Christians of what Denomination soever; and their natural Thirst of Lucre makes them careless which Party they betray, so that they can avail themselves thereby. Though to do them Justice, they generally take Care to advantage the highest Bidder by their Information. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/168/mode/2up 326])</blockquote>
	* For examples of Jewish spying, see ‘[[Evidence (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Thurloe Papers\|Thurloe Papers]]’ under Evidence.		* For examples of Jewish spying, see [[Evidence (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Thurloe Papers\|Thurloe Papers]] under Evidence.
	* See ‘[[Quotes (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Historian Hilaire Belloc Regarding Worldwide Jewish Spies\|Historian Hilaire Belloc Regarding Worldwide Jewish Spies]]’ under Quotes.		* See [[Quotes (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Historian Hilaire Belloc Regarding Worldwide Jewish Spies\|Historian Hilaire Belloc Regarding Worldwide Jewish Spies]] under Quotes.

	=== Fateful prophecy of England’s destruction for siding with Jews ===		=== Fateful prophecy of England’s destruction for siding with Jews ===
Line 230:		Line 230:
	<blockquote>If one surveys history, it is rare to find a similar incident. All of the powers of the state had, in some cases unanimously, supported the law, and now they all — king, ministers, lords, bishops, members of Parliament — had to submit to the people. The Earl of Chesterfield thought differently to our view of the people’s opposition. He saw it as nothing more than ‘groundless and senseless clamors’ instigated by politically motivated rabble-rousers, and condemned the Duke of Newcastle for allowing himself to be intimidated by it.' Another contemporary figure, Horace Walpole, the youngest son of Sir Robert Walpole, took a similar view and saw it all as mainly a problem of ‘little curates’ and ‘drunken aldermen.’ We cannot agree with these lawmakers in any way, but see in the events of 1753 the defensive struggle of a strong and healthy people against Jewish infiltration. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n337/mode/2up 339])</blockquote>		<blockquote>If one surveys history, it is rare to find a similar incident. All of the powers of the state had, in some cases unanimously, supported the law, and now they all — king, ministers, lords, bishops, members of Parliament — had to submit to the people. The Earl of Chesterfield thought differently to our view of the people’s opposition. He saw it as nothing more than ‘groundless and senseless clamors’ instigated by politically motivated rabble-rousers, and condemned the Duke of Newcastle for allowing himself to be intimidated by it.' Another contemporary figure, Horace Walpole, the youngest son of Sir Robert Walpole, took a similar view and saw it all as mainly a problem of ‘little curates’ and ‘drunken aldermen.’ We cannot agree with these lawmakers in any way, but see in the events of 1753 the defensive struggle of a strong and healthy people against Jewish infiltration. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n337/mode/2up 339])</blockquote>
	* Sir Robert Walpole was perhaps the most corrupt politician of his time. It is unsurprising that his son distained the righteous people’s movement.		* Sir Robert Walpole was perhaps the most corrupt politician of his time. It is unsurprising that his son distained the righteous people’s movement.
	** See ‘[[Villains (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Sir Robert Walpole\|Sir Robert Walpole]]’ under Villains.		** See [[Villains (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Sir Robert Walpole\|Sir Robert Walpole]] under Villains.

	== Summary and Analysis of the 1753 Naturalization Bill Conflict ==		== Summary and Analysis of the 1753 Naturalization Bill Conflict ==
Line 289:		Line 289:
	* Montefiore's humanitarian services?		* Montefiore's humanitarian services?
	** Covered up the 1840 ritual murder in Damascus, using British power and world Jewry’s resources to bully the local officials. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/159/mode/2up 475])		** Covered up the 1840 ritual murder in Damascus, using British power and world Jewry’s resources to bully the local officials. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/159/mode/2up 475])
	** See ‘[[Villains (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Moses Montefiore\|Moses Montefiore]]’ under Villains.		** See [[Villains (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Moses Montefiore\|Moses Montefiore]] under Villains.

	* See [[Themes (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#“Philanthropy”\|“Philanthropy”]] under ‘Jewish Tactics’ under Themes.		* See [[Themes (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#“Philanthropy”\|“Philanthropy”]] under ‘Jewish Tactics’ under Themes.
Line 480:		Line 480:
	* The “compromise” bill would be the Jew bill that would finally pass the House of Lords.		* The “compromise” bill would be the Jew bill that would finally pass the House of Lords.
	* The bill was passed as a result of Lord Derby’s betrayal.		* The bill was passed as a result of Lord Derby’s betrayal.
	** See ‘[[Quotes (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Why did Lord Derby Change Sides?\|Why did Lord Derby Change Sides?]]’ under Quotes.		** See [[Quotes (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Why did Lord Derby Change Sides?\|Why did Lord Derby Change Sides?]] under Quotes.
	** See ‘Lord Derby’ under ‘[[Themes (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Conservative Betrayal\|Conservative Betrayal]]’ under Themes for a full accounting of the reasons leading to Lord Derby’s betrayal.		** See ‘Lord Derby’ under [[Themes (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Conservative Betrayal\|Conservative Betrayal]] under Themes for a full accounting of the reasons leading to Lord Derby’s betrayal.

	=== Earl of Clancarty’s Heartbreaking Soliloquy ===		=== Earl of Clancarty’s Heartbreaking Soliloquy ===
Line 538:		Line 538:
	* Aldag had previously speculated that the power of the press could have been the largest factor, as the Jews, forcing a constiutional crisis, could have destroyed the government, or even provoked a French Revolution style attack on the House of Lords.		* Aldag had previously speculated that the power of the press could have been the largest factor, as the Jews, forcing a constiutional crisis, could have destroyed the government, or even provoked a French Revolution style attack on the House of Lords.
	<blockquote>What today is not wished to be seen in most spheres of England, threatened to happen: an unprecedented constitutional crisis. In the most irresponsible way, the Jews and their friends fanned the flames in their newspapers against the House of Lords and demanded more or less openly a violent intervention into the rights of the Lords, whose undignified fate can be partly explained by this. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/97/mode/2up 446])</blockquote>		<blockquote>What today is not wished to be seen in most spheres of England, threatened to happen: an unprecedented constitutional crisis. In the most irresponsible way, the Jews and their friends fanned the flames in their newspapers against the House of Lords and demanded more or less openly a violent intervention into the rights of the Lords, whose undignified fate can be partly explained by this. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/97/mode/2up 446])</blockquote>
	* See ‘Lord Derby’ under ‘[[Themes (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Conservative Betrayal\|Conservative Betrayal]]’ under Themes for a full accounting of the reasons leading to Lord Derby’s betrayal.		* See ‘Lord Derby’ under [[Themes (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Conservative Betrayal\|Conservative Betrayal]] under Themes for a full accounting of the reasons leading to Lord Derby’s betrayal.

	== A Firsthand Report of Jewish London Life in the 1840s ==		== A Firsthand Report of Jewish London Life in the 1840s ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 2 November 2025
Line 41:		Line 41:
	== Historian Hilaire Belloc Regarding Worldwide Jewish Spies ==		== Historian Hilaire Belloc Regarding Worldwide Jewish Spies ==
	* Every Jew in the world was effectively a Jewish spy for Britain		* Every Jew in the world was effectively a Jewish spy for Britain
	<blockquote>The Jewish news agencies of the nineteenth century favoured England in all her policy, political as well as commercial; they opposed those of her rivals and especially those of her enemies. The Jewish knowledge of the East was at the service of England. His international penetration of the European governments was also at her service — so was his secret information. With the consolidation of the Indian Empire after the Mutiny the Jews were again an ally from their traditional hatred of the Russian people, which hatred has led them in our time to wreak so awful a vengeance upon their former oppressors. The Jew might also be called a British agent upon the Continent of Europe, and still more in the Near and Far East, where the economic power of England extended even more rapidly than her political power. (165) </blockquote>		<blockquote>The Jewish news agencies of the nineteenth century favoured England in all her policy, political as well as commercial; they opposed those of her rivals and especially those of her enemies. The Jewish knowledge of the East was at the service of England. His international penetration of the European governments was also at her service — so was his secret information. With the consolidation of the Indian Empire after the Mutiny the Jews were again an ally from their traditional hatred of the Russian people, which hatred has led them in our time to wreak so awful a vengeance upon their former oppressors. The Jew might also be called a British agent upon the Continent of Europe, and still more in the Near and Far East, where the economic power of England extended even more rapidly than her political power. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/127/mode/2up 165]) </blockquote>

	* See [[Evidence (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Thurloe Papers\|Thurloe Papers]] under Evidence.		* See [[Evidence (Jewry in England-- Peter Aldag)#Thurloe Papers\|Thurloe Papers]] under Evidence.
Line 545:		Line 545:

	== A Firsthand Report of Jewish London Life in the 1840s ==		== A Firsthand Report of Jewish London Life in the 1840s ==
	* From the Translator’s Appendix to Volume 6 (558)		* From the Translator’s Appendix to Volume 6 ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n557/mode/2up 558])
	* Reports that the Jews were behind coin clipping and especially prostitution rings		* Reports that the Jews were behind coin clipping and especially prostitution rings
	<blockquote>...for this the current coin of the realm is clipped, and ingots and sovereigns perspire: for this the pander [pimp] entraps, and the bawd [madam] opens wide the gates that lead to everlasting death, trafficking in Christian flesh for purposes worse than the worst of slavery… we see the daughter of a Christian man patrolling the streets, decorated in the trumpery properties of a Jewish brothel, while the devil’s dam, in the shape of a hideous Hebrew hag, follows the poor unfortunate, like the shadow of death, to clutch the wages of her shame, we really think a Christian government might, without any hazard of public odium, string up at the doors of their own dens, Mother Abrahams, Mother Isaacs, and Mother Jacobs. But, after all, perhaps it is better as it is: if this abominable traffic must be connived at, it is better that those should have the monopoly who have nothing in common with us, save that which the weasel has in common with its prey: those who have made a god of mammon, worshipping the golden calf with the tenfold idolatry of their fathers. (559)</blockquote>		<blockquote>...for this the current coin of the realm is clipped, and ingots and sovereigns perspire: for this the pander [pimp] entraps, and the bawd [madam] opens wide the gates that lead to everlasting death, trafficking in Christian flesh for purposes worse than the worst of slavery… we see the daughter of a Christian man patrolling the streets, decorated in the trumpery properties of a Jewish brothel, while the devil’s dam, in the shape of a hideous Hebrew hag, follows the poor unfortunate, like the shadow of death, to clutch the wages of her shame, we really think a Christian government might, without any hazard of public odium, string up at the doors of their own dens, Mother Abrahams, Mother Isaacs, and Mother Jacobs. But, after all, perhaps it is better as it is: if this abominable traffic must be connived at, it is better that those should have the monopoly who have nothing in common with us, save that which the weasel has in common with its prey: those who have made a god of mammon, worshipping the golden calf with the tenfold idolatry of their fathers. (559)</blockquote>
Line 593:		Line 593:
	A deputation from the Board waited on the Home Secretary and stated its objections to various provisions in the measure, and he promised that their view should be considered. The bill was subsequently withdrawn.		A deputation from the Board waited on the Home Secretary and stated its objections to various provisions in the measure, and he promised that their view should be considered. The bill was subsequently withdrawn.

	What was it Arnold White had been quoted as saying on August 16th, 1903? ‘No measures whatsoever could be taken without the consent of Jewish leaders’? Events have been shown to prove him right. (618)</blockquote>		What was it Arnold White had been quoted as saying on August 16th, 1903? ‘No measures whatsoever could be taken without the consent of Jewish leaders’? Events have been shown to prove him right. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n617/mode/2up 618])</blockquote>

	== Limerick Uprising of 1904 ==		== Limerick Uprising of 1904 ==
Line 604:		Line 604:
	<blockquote>The British government offered the Zionists El Arish, part of so-called Egyptian Palestine, as a replacement for Palestine. A joint commission was sent out to examine settlement options. However, the report that was produced was not even published and the project was quietly dropped.		<blockquote>The British government offered the Zionists El Arish, part of so-called Egyptian Palestine, as a replacement for Palestine. A joint commission was sent out to examine settlement options. However, the report that was produced was not even published and the project was quietly dropped.

	This is said to have been a great disappointment for Joseph Chamberlain who, on one of his trips to the African colonies, thought that he had found a suitable place for the Jews in a part of Uganda. He immediately reported this to Lord Lansdowne and Lord Percy, who were also enthusiastic about the plan. In a 1903 letter from the Foreign Office to the Zionists, Lord Lansdowne announced that he had ‘studied the question with the interest which His Majesty’s Government must always take in any well-considered scheme for the amelioration of the position of the Jewish race’. He then went on to detail the government's proposals for the scheme in British East Africa, which were ‘the grant of a considerable tract of land, the appointment of a Jewish official as the chief of the local administration, and permission to the colony to have a free hand in regard to municipal legislation, and as to the management of religious and purely domestic matters, such local autonomy being conditional upon the right of His Majesty’s Government to exercise general control.’ The Zionists withheld their decision on this offer until after their leading members all over the world had been consulted. When, after two years, no final position had been taken, Joseph Chamberlain's successor, Lord Alfred Lyttelton, made the proposal again. Due to opposition from Jews who wanted Palestine or nothing, the British government's plan was rejected some time later. (663)</blockquote><blockquote>... 20th May, 1917, Weizmann, who was Chairman, explained in his opening address that the Zionist Movement was ‘never built... on the sufferings of our people in Russia or elsewhere’. Rather, the cause of Zionism was the ‘ineradicable national striving of Jewry to have a home of its own — a national centre, a national home with a national Jewish life. (666)</blockquote>		This is said to have been a great disappointment for Joseph Chamberlain who, on one of his trips to the African colonies, thought that he had found a suitable place for the Jews in a part of Uganda. He immediately reported this to Lord Lansdowne and Lord Percy, who were also enthusiastic about the plan. In a 1903 letter from the Foreign Office to the Zionists, Lord Lansdowne announced that he had ‘studied the question with the interest which His Majesty’s Government must always take in any well-considered scheme for the amelioration of the position of the Jewish race’. He then went on to detail the government's proposals for the scheme in British East Africa, which were ‘the grant of a considerable tract of land, the appointment of a Jewish official as the chief of the local administration, and permission to the colony to have a free hand in regard to municipal legislation, and as to the management of religious and purely domestic matters, such local autonomy being conditional upon the right of His Majesty’s Government to exercise general control.’ The Zionists withheld their decision on this offer until after their leading members all over the world had been consulted. When, after two years, no final position had been taken, Joseph Chamberlain's successor, Lord Alfred Lyttelton, made the proposal again. Due to opposition from Jews who wanted Palestine or nothing, the British government's plan was rejected some time later. (663)</blockquote><blockquote>... 20th May, 1917, Weizmann, who was Chairman, explained in his opening address that the Zionist Movement was ‘never built... on the sufferings of our people in Russia or elsewhere’. Rather, the cause of Zionism was the ‘ineradicable national striving of Jewry to have a home of its own — a national centre, a national home with a national Jewish life. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n665/mode/2up 666])</blockquote>

	== Historian and British Insider Harold Temperley on the Balfour Declaration ==		== Historian and British Insider Harold Temperley on the Balfour Declaration ==
Line 611:		Line 611:
	Another most cogent reason why the policy of the Declaration should be adopted by the Allies lay in the state of Russia herself. Russian Jews had been secretly active on behalf of the Central Powers from the first; they had become the chief agents of German pacifist propaganda; by 1917 they had done much in preparation for that general disintegration of Russian national life, later recognized as the revolution. It was believed that if Great Britain declared for the fulfilment of Zionist aspirations in Palestine under her own pledge, one effect would be to bring Russian Jewry to the cause of the Entente.		Another most cogent reason why the policy of the Declaration should be adopted by the Allies lay in the state of Russia herself. Russian Jews had been secretly active on behalf of the Central Powers from the first; they had become the chief agents of German pacifist propaganda; by 1917 they had done much in preparation for that general disintegration of Russian national life, later recognized as the revolution. It was believed that if Great Britain declared for the fulfilment of Zionist aspirations in Palestine under her own pledge, one effect would be to bring Russian Jewry to the cause of the Entente.

	It was believed, also, that such a declaration would have a potent influence upon world Jewry in the same way, and secure for the Entente the aid of Jewish financial interests. It was believed, further, that it would greatly influence American opinion in favour of the Allies. Such were the chief considerations which, during the later part of 1916 and the next ten months of 1917, impelled the British Government towards making a contract with Jewry. (668)</blockquote>		It was believed, also, that such a declaration would have a potent influence upon world Jewry in the same way, and secure for the Entente the aid of Jewish financial interests. It was believed, further, that it would greatly influence American opinion in favour of the Allies. Such were the chief considerations which, during the later part of 1916 and the next ten months of 1917, impelled the British Government towards making a contract with Jewry. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/420/mode/2up 668])</blockquote>

	== Historian Hilaire Belloc on the Jews during the 19th Century ==		== Historian Hilaire Belloc on the Jews during the 19th Century ==
Line 641:		Line 641:

	=== "The Harsh, Ugly, Unhealthy, Vulgar, Nervous, and Spiritless Life of Modern Times" ===		=== "The Harsh, Ugly, Unhealthy, Vulgar, Nervous, and Spiritless Life of Modern Times" ===
	<blockquote>And when I look around me to-day, and perceive the harsh, ugly, unhealthy, vulgar, nervous and spiritless life of modern times; when I see the seething discontent in all grades of society, and especially in the women of north-western Europe, it seems to me by no means extravagant or even fantastic to suppose that at this present moment we are witnessing the final unfolding of the bloom, the finest flower and the most perfect product of that religion of gain and greed, of trade and so-called liberty, of uncontrolled capitalism and unscrupulous exploitation; of the contempt of beauty, health, vigour, sexuality and high spirits, whereof the hygiene, the diet, the moral principles and the whole outlook on the world are to be sought and found in the general attitude of [puritanism] (219-220)</blockquote>		<blockquote>And when I look around me to-day, and perceive the harsh, ugly, unhealthy, vulgar, nervous and spiritless life of modern times; when I see the seething discontent in all grades of society, and especially in the women of north-western Europe, it seems to me by no means extravagant or even fantastic to suppose that at this present moment we are witnessing the final unfolding of the bloom, the finest flower and the most perfect product of that religion of gain and greed, of trade and so-called liberty, of uncontrolled capitalism and unscrupulous exploitation; of the contempt of beauty, health, vigour, sexuality and high spirits, whereof the hygiene, the diet, the moral principles and the whole outlook on the world are to be sought and found in the general attitude of [puritanism] ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/342/mode/2up 219]-[https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/n219/mode/2up 220])</blockquote>

	=== England Unrecognizable ===		=== England Unrecognizable ===
Line 657:		Line 657:

	=== The English People under Mind Control ===		=== The English People under Mind Control ===
	<blockquote>We have mass-thought and opinion imposed on the population, in the same way as are their standardized manufactured boots… and any attempt at raising them from their hypnotic condition, by stating truths that are incompatible with their standardized intellectual pabulum, is to earn the reputation of insanity or crankiness. (790)</blockquote>		<blockquote>We have mass-thought and opinion imposed on the population, in the same way as are their standardized manufactured boots… and any attempt at raising them from their hypnotic condition, by stating truths that are incompatible with their standardized intellectual pabulum, is to earn the reputation of insanity or crankiness. ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/1059/mode/2up 790])</blockquote>

	=== Ludovici regarding National Socialist Germany's Flourishing ===		=== Ludovici regarding National Socialist Germany's Flourishing ===
Line 681:		Line 681:
	* Famous for miserable working conditions, which gave rise to British Fascism		* Famous for miserable working conditions, which gave rise to British Fascism
	* From Jewish Chronicle		* From Jewish Chronicle
	<blockquote>“A Trade Union official told me that among some of the rank and file of the furniture workers there was a strong latent anti-Semitic feeling, and it is no mere coincidence that the Blackshirts are strongest in Bethnal Green and Shoreditch, districts which have always been the centres of the furniture trade. A large outward movement has taken place to districts like Tottenham, Ponder’s End, Slough and Wembley, and again it is no mere coincidence that there is a strong anti-Jewish feeling around Angel Road, Tottenham, where Jewish manufacturers maintain large establishments employing 95 per cent. non-Jewish labour. The truth is that some Jewish employers in the furniture trade have made antisemites of their employees because of the bad conditions of work.” (778)</blockquote>		<blockquote>“A Trade Union official told me that among some of the rank and file of the furniture workers there was a strong latent anti-Semitic feeling, and it is no mere coincidence that the Blackshirts are strongest in Bethnal Green and Shoreditch, districts which have always been the centres of the furniture trade. A large outward movement has taken place to districts like Tottenham, Ponder’s End, Slough and Wembley, and again it is no mere coincidence that there is a strong anti-Jewish feeling around Angel Road, Tottenham, where Jewish manufacturers maintain large establishments employing 95 per cent. non-Jewish labour. The truth is that some Jewish employers in the furniture trade have made antisemites of their employees because of the bad conditions of work.” ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/1023/mode/2up 778])</blockquote>
	*National Amalgamated Furnishing Trades Association<blockquote>“Records will prove that an extraordinary proportion of those in the furniture trade. It is a known fact that furniture manufacture and distribution is controlled almost exclusively by Jewish employers; Fascist propagandists, because of the low wages and excessive hours of employment prevailing in factories, find such vicious exploitation a fertile ground for anti-Semitism.” (778)</blockquote>		*National Amalgamated Furnishing Trades Association<blockquote>“Records will prove that an extraordinary proportion of those in the furniture trade. It is a known fact that furniture manufacture and distribution is controlled almost exclusively by Jewish employers; Fascist propagandists, because of the low wages and excessive hours of employment prevailing in factories, find such vicious exploitation a fertile ground for anti-Semitism.” ([https://archive.org/details/dr-peter-aldag-jewry-in-england-vols-1-7/page/1023/mode/2up 778])</blockquote>
	== The Patriotism of the Jew is a Cloak ==		== The Patriotism of the Jew is a Cloak ==
	* Aldag summarizes and relates Jewish quotes that relate to their identity as and loyalty to the Jewish nation, as opposed to host countries like Britain.		* Aldag summarizes and relates Jewish quotes that relate to their identity as and loyalty to the Jewish nation, as opposed to host countries like Britain.